Court on Its Own Motion v. THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
WPC/4632/2019 · 2025-01-27
Deepak Roshan
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23976 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23976 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (PIL) No. 4632 of 2019
Court on its Own Motion
Versus (1) The Director, Directorate of Enforcement, 6th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, PO PS Khan Market, New Delhi, 110003. (2) The Assistant Director (PMLA), Directorate of Enforcement, P.P. Compound, Kaushalya Chamber-II, Ranchi, Sub-Zonal Office, Ranchi. (3) The State of Jharkhand. (4) The Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. (5) The Union of India. (6) The Secretary, Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Jharkhand, Project Building, PO/PS- Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand. (7) The Central Vigilance Commissioner, Central Vigilance Commission, Satarkata Bhawan, A-Block, GPO Complex INA, P.O. & P.S.- G.P.O. Complex, New Delhi, Delhi 110023. (8) Amrendra Pratap Singh, I.A.S. The Then Principal Secretary, Drinking & Sanitation Department, P.O. & P.S. District- Jharkhand. (9) Anti corruption Bureau, Jharkhand. (10) Director General, In-charge, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jharkhand. (11) Central Bureau of Investigation. ... Respondents
--------- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- Amicus Curiae: A.C. to Mr. Rohitashya Roy For the State: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. For the ED: Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate
Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate
--------- 35/Dated: 27.01.2025 M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.(Oral) 1) It is stated by the counsel for the State Government that charge- sheets have been filed in all the cases against the persons suspected of commission of offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2) Therefore, no further orders are required in this Public Interest Litigation. 3) It is, accordingly, closed. 4) Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Manoj/ Pramanik/