Masjid-e-Kumarwada, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/22446/2020 · 2025-09-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23973 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23973 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010338702020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 22446/2020 Between:
1. MASJID-E-KUMARWADA, POPULARLY KNOWN AS MASJID-E- ZABAR, KUMARWARDA, KURNOOL, REP.ITS MANAGING COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MD. MAHBOOB BASHA, S/O LATE S.M.MD.IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 34/158A, KUMARWADA STREET, KURNOOL
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT A.P.
SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI AMRAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL AT KURNOOL
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IV TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL TOWN.
5. THE A P STATE WAQF BOARD, REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 4TH FLOOR, IMDAD GHAR, OPP KALESHWAR RAO MARKET VIJAYAWADA
6. SRI ARYA ACHARY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 76-97-192-5-10-2 SRI SATYA SAI NAGAR, UNCHALA ROAD KURNOOL
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of MANDAMUS, Declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not implementing the Injunction Order granted by the A.P State Waqf Tribunal against 6th respondent in I.A. No 224 of 2019 in O.S.No.23 of 2019 dated 10-12-2019 by providing Police Aid or Picket having received representations 16-12-2019 and 6-11-2020 as being Illegal, Arbitrary, Capricious, Malafide, contrary to the G.O. Ms. No 18 Minorities Welfare (
2
IDM) Department dated 13-10-2019, amounts to dereliction of duties, consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to provide Police Aid or Picket for protection of Waqf Land as per the Injunction order and pass
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent/State is in attendance.
In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 22446 of 2020
04.09.2025
Mjl /*