IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 3361 of 2025 With ABLAPL No.3362 of 2025 In ABLAPL No.3361/2025 Purnima Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. J. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Dash, ASC In ABLAPL No.3362/2025 Khageswar Suna @ Rambabu …. Petitioner Mr. J. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Dash, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 28.03.2025 01. 1. Since both the bail applications arise out of the same F.I.R., on consent of the parties, they are taken up analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that since omnibus allegations have been made and taking into account the nature of allegations, since charge sheet has already been filed, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not warranted. Hence, the petitioners may be protected by pre-arrest bail. 4. Such submission is opposed by the learned counsel for the State. 5. On a conspectus of materials on record, this Court directs that on surrendering within four weeks hence, the petitioners shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be fixed by the learned Court below. 6. Accordingly, the ABLAPLs stand disposed of. 7. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Manoj Designation: AR-CUM-SENIOR SECRETARY