Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23970 (KAR)

SRI. M. NARAYANSWAMY v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/11252/2025 · 2025-04-28

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17489 WP No. 11252 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 11252 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. M. NARAYANSWAMY S/O AGRAHARA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. SRI. VENKATESHAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SRI. Y.NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 4. SRI. YELLESH S/O LATE YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 5. SRI. SRINIVAS S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 6. SRI.ASHWATHAKUMAR. C S/O CHOWDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 7. SRI.SHASHIKUMAR S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 8. SRI. KRISHNAPPA.M S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 9. SRI. RAMANJINI S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 10. SRI.MUNIYAPPA Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17489 WP No. 11252 of 2025 S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 11. SRI. PRAKASH S/O LATE HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 12. SRI. GURAPPA S/O LATE DODDA ERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 13. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 14. SRI.MANJUNATHA.V S/O VENKATASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 15. SRI. SHAMA S/O CHANDRAPPA, AED ABOUT 45 YEARS 16. SRI. C.N.CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 17. SRI. BYRAPPA S/O SONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 18. SRI.NAGARAJAPPA S/O LATE SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF CHANNARAYAPURA/ VENKATAPURA VILLAGE HUTTURU HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT 563 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.SHIVAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF KARNATAKA ROOM NO 317, 3RD FLOOR, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI VIKHASA SOUDHA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001 - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17489 WP No. 11252 of 2025 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 101 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR 563 101 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT, KOLAR- 563 101. 5. DR.MYTHRI.P.S D/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASST. COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB DIVISION KOLAR 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.MANJUNATH., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN LND. RUO13/2014-15 ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT NO.3- ASSISTANT COMMISISONER, KOLAR AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER ON THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN FORM NO.50 AT ANNEXURE-C SERIES IN THE YEAR 1991-92 AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS FOR GRANT OF LAND AS PROVIDED UNDER THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT AND RULES TO THE EXTENT IN CULTIVATION AND POSSESSION OF THE PETITIONERS SINCE SEVERAL DECADES, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:17489 WP No. 11252 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is to direct the Assistant Commissioner to pass appropriate orders on the applications filed by the petitioners in Form No.50 in the year 1981-82. 2. It is the complaint of the petitioners that the request of the petitioners for considering the applications is pending for past several years and, therefore, an appropriate direction be issued to the Assistant Commissioner. 3. It is noticed that the applications that have been filed for regularization in Form No.50 have been pending consideration since 1991. It would, therefore, be appropriate to direct the Assistant Commissioner to take steps to ensure that the proceedings initiated at the instance of the petitioners are concluded at the earliest and at any rate within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:17489 WP No. 11252 of 2025 4. If any such applications are filed seeking for securing the records, the Assistant Commissioner shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE hnm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 80