- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:33386 WP No. 10203 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 10203 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI MANJUNATH RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE MITHALAJI DOSHI R/A MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD CHIKKAMAGALUR-577101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARDHAMAN V GUNJAL., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA -562159. 2. ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE D C RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA -562159. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159. 4. THE TAHASILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:33386 WP No. 10203 of 2020 5. THE REVENUE OFFICER KASABA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TK. RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA -562159. 6. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT BILAGUNBA CIRCLE KASABA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159. 7. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT HALLIMALA CIRCLE KASABA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159. 8. K S UMESH S/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A NO.54, CHITANYA NILAYA OPP TO H P GAS OFFICE WARD NO.27, VIVEKANANDANAGARA RAMANAGARA-562159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. H.R. AMARAVATHI, AGA FOR R1 TO R7 SRI. M.C. RAVIKUMAR & SRI. SUHAS P., ADVOCATES FOR R8) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ANNEXURE-A DATED 2ND JULY 2020 PASSED BY THE 3RD ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, IN M.A.NO.07/2020 AND ANENXURE-B PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 BY THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC RAMANAGARA, DATED 30TH JANUARY, 2020 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:33386 WP No. 10203 of 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER This Court has received the information that the Miscellaneous Appeal from out of which the present writ petition arises viz., M.A.No.7/2020 was dismissed as withdrawn on 23.12.2020 and therefore, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of for the reasons stated above. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL