Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23963 (AP)

Mr.P.Subramanyam Setty v. The State Bank of India

SA/759/2003 · 2025-01-22

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010338742003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 759/2003 Between: 1. MR.P.SUBRAMANYAM SETTY, S/O.ASWARTHA NARAYANA SETTY MR.P.SUBRAMANYAM SETTY, R/O.H.NO.4/14,BAZAR STREET, VAYALPAD, ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, VAYALPAD BRABCH MANAGER THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, VAYALPAD, 2. MR P NARAYANA MURTNY, S/O.ASWARTHA NARAYANA SETTY MURTHY MEDICAL AGENCY MR.P.NARAYANA MURTHY, R/O.VAYALPAD, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. MR T RAMESH, S/O,T.S.VENKATRATNAM SETTY MR.T.RAMESH, R/O.BAZAR STREET, VAYALPAD, ...RESPONDENT(S): THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.10.2002, passed in A.S.No.02 of 2000, on the file of the learned VII Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, reversing the Decree and Judgment dated 30.09.1999, passed in O.S.No.323 of 1996, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Piler. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as per their instructions, the matter is settled out of the Court and requests this Court to close this appeal. 3. Recording the above submission and without going into the correctness of the said submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, the Second Appeal is dismissed as cause does not survive. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 22.01.2025 M K K