IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13852 of 2025 Date of decision: 28.08.2025 Bhagat Ram. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. K.R. Kashyap and Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral): Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The limited prayer made in the petition is to direct respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation of petitioner, copy of which has been placed on record as Annexure P-4. It has been contended that the petitioner is working in Government Centre Primary School, Bagipul, District Kullu, for more than eight years. Petitioner is seeking his transfer to any of places as reflected in his 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- representation dated 20.07.2025 (Annexure P-4) on the ground of family circumstances. 3. Since, the only prayer of the petitioner is to direct respondent No.2 to decide his representation, without adverting to the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within three weeks from today. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Satyen Vaidya) 28th August, 2024 Judge (Pardeep)