Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 1159 of 2024 Date of decision 03.03.2025 Mukesh Sharma & another ....Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.1/State Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties, under instructions, submit that the matter has not been reconciled between the parties. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to assail the matter on merits. In view above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 03rd March, 2025 (Ravinder)