Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23953 (ALL)

SADDAM ALIAS SAHIL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/7136/2025 · 2025-05-14

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80623 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7136 of 2025 Applicant :- Saddam Alias Sahil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, seeking regular bail in Case Crime No.220 of 2022, under Sections 380, 457 IPC, Police Station - Mirapur, District - Muzaffar Nagar. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted that applicant was not named in the F.I.R., his name was disclosed in the confessional statement of co-accused, Veer Vikram Bahadur Singh. It is further submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to ulterior motive. Criminal history of nine cases has been explained in paragraph - 15 of the paper book. It is further submitted that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed on 03.07.2024 and the court concerned has taken cognizance on 21.08.2024. It is further submitted that similarly placed co- accused, Veer Vikram Bahadur Singh has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.11.2023 and, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Applicant is languishing in jail since 21.06.2024. 3. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, it is prayed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant that applicant may be released on bail in the aforesaid crime. It is undertaken by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant shall abide by all terms and conditions as imposed by this Court. 4. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the bail application of applicant, but he has not contradicted the facts as stated by learned counsel for the applicant during arguments. 5. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State, perused the contents made in bail application and material available on record. 6. I have gone through the contents made in the bail application as well as the documents appended with the bail application and perused the affidavit. It is admitted fact that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed and the court concerned has also taken cognizance; criminal history of nine cases has already been explained; co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; applicant is languishing in jail for about one year, there is no possibility of completion of trial in near future and there is no material brought by learned AGA to establish that if applicant would be enlarged on bail he will influence the trial or the witnesses. 7. Taking into consideration all the entirety of the matter as discussed above, without expressing any finding or opinion on merits of the case, the applicant is releasing on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant - Saddam Alias Sahil, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 9. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad