Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23952 (AP)

Smt. Burugupalli Manjula Rani v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/5518/2020 · 2025-07-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010339292020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5518/2020 Between: 1. SMT. BURUGUPALLI MANJULA RANI, W/O. LATE VASU BABU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC COOLI, R/O. H.NO.10-80, BESTA BAZAR, NEAR PRATIBHA COLLEGE, NADIM TIRUVURU, TIRUVURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SRI POLUSANI DURGA RAO, S/O. RAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, H.NO.2-15, NALLABELLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WARANGAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, (THROUGH S.H.O., WOMEN POLICE STATION, GUNTUR URBAN) REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. 2. YERRAGORLA MANASA DEVI, D/O. VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC STUDENT, R/O. NEW GRUHAKALPA APPARTMENT, ADAVITHAKKELLAPADU, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash Crime No. 139 of 2020 dated 28-10-2020 on the file of the Women Police Station, Guntur Urban, Guntur District against petitioners/Accused No.2 and 3 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. G RAJU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the Petitioners for the following relief: “ .... to quash Crime No. 139 of 2020 dated 28-10-2020 on the file of the Women Police Station, Guntur Urban, Guntur District against petitioners/Accused No.2 and 3 and pass ...” 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioners. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners today. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 5. In that view, this Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Criminal Petition No. 5518 of 2020 22.07.2025 Mjl /*