RASHMI FAUJDAR D/O SHRI PRATAP SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/10374/2025 · 2025-09-03
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23951 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23951 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35199] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10374/2025 Rashmi Faujdar D/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village And Post Mehrawar, Tehsil Kumher, Distt Deeg (Rajasthan) (Eleced As Pradhan Panchayati Samiti Kumher, Distt. Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To Government, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Commissioner (Panchayati Raj. Department) Cum Secretary To Govt. (Inquiry), Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
4. The Additional Commissioner-Cum-Deputy Secretary To Government-Ii (Inquiry), Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur (Rajasthan)
6. The Assistant Engineer, Head Quarter Zila Parishad, Jaipur, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
7. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bejupada, District Dausa (Rajasthan)
8. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kumher, District Deeg (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Maharshi Mr. Devansh Saini Mr. Prashant For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG assisted by
[2025:RJ-JP:35199] (2 of 2) [CW-10374/2025] Mr. Sumit Purohit & Ms. Anjali Ranga JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 03/09/2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the Department is in process of withdrawing the impugned
order dated 18.06.2025 and he seeks liberty on behalf of the Department to pass fresh orders in accordance with law. In view of the submissions made at Bar, by learned counsel for the respondents, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty aforesaid. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed. Consequences to follow.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/62