Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23949 (JHR)

AKHTAR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8064/2025 · 2025-09-18

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:28927 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8064 of 2025 ------ 1. Akhtar Hussain, aged about 36 years, S/o. A. Rahim Shekh @ Rahim Shekh, R/o. Vill.- Rahaspur, P.O.- Pakur, P.S.- Pakur (M), Dist. Pakur, Jharkhand. 2. Daud Shekh @ Daud Hussain, aged about 22 years, S/o. Abdur Rahim 2 Rahim Sk, R/o. Vill.- Rahaspur, P.O.- Pakur, P.S.- Pakur (M), Dist. Pakur, Jharkhand. 3. Safikul Sk, aged about 27 years, S/o. Jakir Sk, R/o. Vill.- Rahaspur, P.O.- Pakur, P.S.- Pakur (M), Dist. Pakur, Jharkhand. … … Petitioners -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party With B.A. No. 8065 of 2025 ------ Mofijul Shekh, aged about 43 years, S/o. Abu Sufiyan, R/o. Vill.- Rahaspur, P.O.- Pakur, P.S.- Pakur (M), Dist. Pakur, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party With B.A. No. 8066 of 2025 ------ 1. Nader Sk @ Nadir Shaikh, aged about 57 years, S/o. Iham Sk @ Iham Biswas; 2. Sadiur Sk @ Sadiur Shaikh, aged about 25 years, S/o. Nader Sk @ Nadir Shaikh; 3. Delwar Sk. @ Delwar Shekh, aged about 36 years, S/o. Nader Sk @ Nadir Shekh; 4. Ali Haidar Sk @ Haydar Sk, aged about 24 years, S/o. Nader Sk @ Nadir Sk; 5. Anwar Shekh, aged about 32 years, S/o. Rohim Shekh; 6. Mansar Shekh, aged about 29 years, S/o. Abu Sufiyan: All are R/o. Vill.- Rahaspur, P.O. & P.S.- Pakur (Muffasil), Dist. Pakur, Jharkhand. … … Petitioners -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, A.P.P. : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate ------ 02/18.09.2025 All these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, all these cases are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard the parties. 3. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 246/2024, for the offences registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 117, 109, 332(c), 303(2), 76, 324(5), 352 & 351(2) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the Court of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur. 4. On 05.12.2024, there was some altercation between the accused persons and the informant party which resulted in free fight. It is alleged that nineteen persons assaulted the informant causing him injuries. It is also alleged that the accused persons looted Rs. 2,80,000/- from his house. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that there is case and counter-case for the same occurrence. It was further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. It was finally submitted that co-accused persons have been granted bail by this court earlier. 6. Learned counsel on behalf of the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 246/2024. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul/- (2)