M/S J.V. EXPORT THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI NIRAPJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER v. MARSHALL MACHINES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER
CR/1113/2019 · 2025-05-20
Vikas Bahl
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23948 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23948 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR No.1113 of 2019 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 261 CR No.1113 of 2019 Date of Decision: 20.05.2025 M/s J.V. Export through its proprietor Sh. Nirapjit Singh and another ..... Petitioners Versus Marshall Machines Private Limited and another ..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None for the parties. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J (ORAL)
1. This is a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 05.04.2017 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana.
2. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that vide order dated 18.07.2024, learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, had observed as under:-
“Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances and the grounds taken by the defendants as provided under Section 19 of the Designs Act, in view of the provisions of Section 22 sub- section (4) of the Designs Act, 2000, the jurisdiction of this Court stands ousted. As such, the application is allowed and the matter is transferred to the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court for its disposal. The parties, through their counsels, are directed to appear before the Registry of the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh on 20.09.2024. The Ahlmad is directed to send the file, complete in all respects, to the Registry of the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court through learned District & Sessions Judge, Ludhiana well before the date fixed”.
DINESH BANSAL 2025.05.23 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CR No.1113 of 2019 -2-
3. Subsequent to the same, CO-1-2024 was registered. On 07.11.2024, the following order was passed by this Court on the said CO-1-2024:-
“1. Vide order dated 18.07.2024, the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, after taking into consideration the provisions of the Design Act, 2000, transferred the matter before this Court and
directed the parties through their counsel to appear before the registry of this Court on 20.09.2024.
2. On 20.09.2024, no one had appeared on behalf of the parties and accordingly, a Coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
“Present: None for the parties. ***** There is no representation on behalf of either of the parties. Adjourned to 07.11.2024. Let the intimation regarding the next date fixed before this Court be given to the respective parties, as well as, to the counsel representing the parties. September 20, 2024”
3. As per the report of the registry, plaintiffs have been served, however, none has appeared on behalf of the parties.
4. In view of the same, present Civil Original is dismissed for non-prosecution”.
4. In view of the same, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(VIKAS BAHL) 20.05.2025 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2025.05.23 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh