IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14180 of 2025 Decided on: 2nd September, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Krishna Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Servedaman Rathore and Mr. Vipin Bhatia, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Kulwant Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Caveat Petition No.205 of 2025 Discharged. The caveat petition stands disposed of. CWP No.14180 of 2025 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitted that in view of law laid down in St. Mary’s Education Society and another Versus 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and others2 and Dileep Kumar Pandey Versus Union of India and others3, this writ petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as not maintainable. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 02, 2025 Judge Mukesh 2 (2023) 4 SCC 498 3 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1192