Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2394 (RAJ)

SURENDRA YADAV S/O SRI RAM BALI YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/234/2025 · 2025-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1331] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 166/2025 Bhanu Pratap Singh S/o Shri Dalpat Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Rotwada, Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 234/2025 Surendra Yadav S/o Sri Ram Bali Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 1-P-9 Mashubn Housing Board Basani Fez First P.s. Bhagat Ki Kothi, Jodhpur Presently Residing At Proprieter Nisha Comunication Basani, Jodhpur (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shandilya Mr. Jitendra Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 B.N.S.S., in connection with F.I.R. No.46/2023 registered at Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur City (West) for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at Bar and also perused the case diary. [2025:RJ-JP:1331] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-166/2025] 4. On perusal of the case diary and the averments made in the First Information Report, the allegation levelled against the accused-petitioners is of issuance of 200 SIM on record so as to gain monetary benefits in the form of commission. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the accused- petitioners have gained the monetary benefit by showing issuance of 200 SIM in their own record. No other benefit except monetary benefit has been derived by issuing 200 SIM and preparing the record in office. 6. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and so also the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 20.12.2024, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /18-19