Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23939 (GAU)

PANKAJ DUGGAR v. SUNITA DEVI AGARWAL

CRP/99/2016 · 2025-12-04

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010011302016 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/99/2016 PANKAJ DUGGAR S/O ANUP KUMAR DUGGAR PROPRIETOR OF JAIN COMPUTERS, SITUATED AT GAR- ALI, JORHAT R/O DIGAMBARCHUK, JORHAT. VERSUS SUNITA DEVI AGARWAL W/O SHRI ISWAR PRASAD AGARWAL, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF GAR- ALI, OPPOSITE RUKSONS, P.S. and DIST. JORHAT. Advocate for the Petitioner : NO ADVOCATE, MR. S HAZARIKA,K BHARALI,P LHAMU,MR B KAUSHIK Advocate for the Respondent : MS. P BHATTACHARYA, MR. B K GOSWAMI,MR. P P DUTTA,MR. T J MAHANTA,MS. M KALITA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 05.12.2025 1. Heard Mr. B. Kaushik, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T.J. Mahanta, the learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. A. Baruah, the learned counsel for the respondent. Page No.# 2/2 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue this matter and may be allowed to withdraw the instant civil revision petition. 3. The learned Senior Counsel for the respondent does not have any objection to the said prayer. 4. Hence, the prayer is allowed. 5. This civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal. 6. The stay order passed earlier shall remain vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant