Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23937 (JHR)

ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU THROUGH INVESTIGATING OFFICER NAMELY NAVIN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3010/2024 · 2025-02-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3010 of 2024 ------ Anti-Corruption Bureau through Investigating Officer namely Navin Kumar Singh aged about 43 years, S/o Nand Lal Prasad Singh, presently R/o A/101, Nand Rani Niwas, Vir Kunwar Singh Colony, Airport Road, P.O- Doranda, P.S.- Airport, District- Ranchi. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ram Binod Sinha S/o Late Yogendra Pd. Sinha, the then Junior Engineer, Rural Development, Special Division, Khunti, P.O. & P.S. & Dist- Khunti, Presently under judicial custody in Central Jail, Birsa Munda, Hotwar, P.O. & P.S. Khatanga, Dist- Ranchi … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepankar, Advocate Mr. P.C. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-14-02-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 28.06.2024. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 28.06.2024. It is next submitted that Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 was listed before this Bench and the petitioner was directed to remove defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks from the date of that order. It is next submitted that for removing defects, one supplementary affidavit was to be filed but due to inadvertence, other defects could not be removed within the stipulated period; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 28.06.2024. It is then submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 28.06.2024 before this court was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.898 of 2023 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/