Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23936 (AP)

Sri G. Srinivasulu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/22388/2020 · 2025-09-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010337962020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22388 OF 2020 Between: Sri G. Srinivasulu, S/o late Veeraiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ; Advocate/ BJP Proddatur In-Charge, Residing at D No. 7/62/1 Chowdeswari Nagar, Proddatur, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh State. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh State. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at YSR Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at YSR Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. 4. The Station House Officer, Proddatur Rural Police Station, YSR Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. 5. The Assistant Sub Inspector, Proddatur Rural Police Station Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. YSR ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be . ^ pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more Particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action inpersuant to the complaint given by the petitioner dated 24-09-2020 for conducting proper enquiry and providing security by way of police protection as the petitioner is having life threat in the hands of some rivals in the town being illegal, arbitrary, and against Article 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of Human Rights and established judicial precedents and consequently direct the respondents especially 2 to 5 to take immediate action forth in pursuant to the representation dt 17-10-2020 given by the petitioner. as lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide security to the petitioner for his life by way of Police Protection forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V. NITESH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: r r APHC010337962020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA [3396] WRIT PETITION No. 22388/2020 Between: 1.SRI G.SRINIVASULU, S/0.LATE VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC:ADVOCATE/BJP PRODDATUR IN-CHARGE, RESIDING AT D.NO.7162/1 CHOWDESWARI NAGAR, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, HOME SECRETARY, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT YSR KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT YSR KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PRODDATUR RURAL POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 5.THE ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR, PRODDATUR RURAL POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more Particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action in pursuant to the complaint given by the petitioner dated 24-09-2020 for conducting proper enquiry and providing security by way of police protection as the petitioner is having life threat in the hands of some rivals in the town as being illegal, arbitrary, and against Articles 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of Human Rights and established judicial precedents and consequently direct the respondents especially 2 to 5 to take immediate action forth in pursuant to the representation dt.17.10.2020 given by the petitioner and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VNITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: " .... to issue a writ order or direction, more Particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action in pursuant to the complaint given by the petitioner dated 24-09-2020 for conducting proper enquiry and providing security by way of police protection as the petitioner is having life threat in the hands of some rivals in the town as being illegal, arbitrary, and against Articles 14, 19, 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of Human Rights and established judicial precedents and consequently direct the respondents especially 2 to 5 to take immediate action forth in pursuant to the representation dt. 17.10.2020 given by the petitioner and pass 2. Sri V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit respondent Police have not taken any action on the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2020 so far and necessary orders may be passed by disposing of this Writ Petition. 3. Sri V.FarooQ, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in that attendance. 4. Considering the submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation to the respondent Police in case of any eminent threat is faced. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ■ . Sd/- N NAGAMMA A.SSiSTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 0^^ SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh State. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at YSR Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at YSR Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. 4. The Station House Officer, Proddatur Rural Police Station, YSR Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. 5. The Assistant Sub Inspector, Proddatur Rural Police Station, YSR Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh State. 6. One CC to Sri V. Nitesh, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 8. Two CD Copies. ssb i: ‘ HIGH COURT DATED:04/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 22388 OF 2020 OfANOM^ ^ 18 SEP 2025 jg) '^^sCiifrantSwIiai^y DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS