Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23934 (AP)

M/S THIRUMALA CONSTRUCTIONS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18819/2024 · 2025-08-03

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010338312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 18819 OF 2024 Between: 1. M/S THIRUMALA CONSTRUCTIONS, H.No. 1/92-430,Dwaraka Nagar, Ananthapuram, Ananthapuram Dist, Represented by Managing Partner Anthapu Somi Reddy, S/o Anthapu Obi Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ- Contractor, D.No. 1-430, Dwaraka Nagar, Ananthapuram, Ananthapuram Dist, Andhra Pradesh State-515001. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Engineer inchief, Roads and Buildings Department (MDR) Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Superintending Engineer, (R and B) Circle, Ananthapuram. 5. The Executive Engineer, (R and B) Division,Dharmavaram, Ananthapuram District. 6. The Deputy Executive Engineer, (R and B) Division, Dharmavaram, Ananthapuram District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: DASARI S V V S V PRASAD 2 Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Dasari S.V.V.S.V. Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Shaik Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings, Transport and Labour. 2. Sri Dasari S.V.V.S.V. Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that the Writ Petitioner has received the due payments, and therefore, no further consideration is necessary. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is disposed of as no further consideration is necessary. No Order as to Costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 04.08.2025 JKS 3 99 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 18819 OF 2024 04.08.2025 JKS