Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23925 (AP)

VADDAMANU KRISHNAMACHARYULU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18935/2025 · 2025-07-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010337502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 18935/2025 Between: VADDAMANU KRISHNAMACHARYULU, S/o. SEETHARAMANUJACHARYULU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC PVT. JOB, R/O. D.NO.7-16-96, 9TH LINE, VALLURIVARI THOTA, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI - 522503 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, NARASARAOPET - 522601 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RENTACHINTALA POLICE STATION, RENTACHINTALA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT - 522421 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C B ADARSH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 2 and 3 in failing to register FIR and investigate the complaints dated 10-02-2025 and 17-02-2025 as contemplated under criminal laws and judicial precedents as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to criminal laws, judicial pronouncements, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to register an FIR based on my complaints dated 10-02-2025 and 17-02-2025 under Sections 336, 337, 338, and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and investigate the same under Sections 169 and 173 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.” 2 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, since the matter is of civil nature, Police have not registered the case on the complaint given by the Petitioner. 3. Sri C.B.Adarsh Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:29.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18935 of 2025 Dt.29.07.2025 Dinesh