IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 1171 of 2024 Date of Decision: 17.03.2025 Mukesh Sharma ... petitioner Versus State of H.P and anr. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vishal, Advocate, vice Avinash Sharma, Advocate. For respondent No.1 : Mr. Tarun Pathak, Deputy Advocate General. For respondent No.2 : Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 17th March, 2025 (saurav pathania) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.