Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23923 (CHH)

SATTU RAM RAJWADE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/859/2021 · 2025-06-12

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:23779-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 859 of 2021 1 - Sattu Ram Rajwade S/o Late Shri Laxman Ram Rajwade Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Parsapara, Police Station And Tehsil Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. (Wrongly Mention In Chalan As Satu)..................Accused ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Superintendent Of Police Surajpur District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. (Prosecution) 4 - Dharmendra Rajwade S/o Late Shri Pitamber Ram Rajwade Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Parsapara, Police Station And Tehsil Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ....................Complainant 5 - Raghuvansh Mani Sharma S/o Shri Mahesh Sharma Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Krishnapur (Kalua), Police Station And Tehsil Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ....................Complainant ... Respondents Cause title has been taken from CIS AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.06.14 14:23:48 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Rishi Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Hari Om Rai, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13.06.2025 1. In the present petition, the petitioner have prayed for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that the Petition may kindly be allowed and the Criminal Case No. 1059/2021 (Annexure P-1), pending in the court of learned C.J.M. Surajpur and its consequential prosecution, for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 304-A of Indian Penal Code & sections 41 (6)/177, 3/181 & 146/196 of the Motor Vehicle Act, may kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charges have been framed and the statement of prosecution witnesses has been started, hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. 3. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Rahul/ Amardeep