Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23922 (KAR)

ABDUL MAJEED v. SMT. SHABANA

RFA/519/2017 · 2025-06-17

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20720 RFA No. 519 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2017 (INJ) BETWEEN: ABDUL MAJEED S/O ABDUL RASHEED, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.242, IDGAH MOHALLA, MODI ROAD, D.J.HALLI, BENGALORE-560 045. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KUMARA.K.G., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SMT. SHABANA W/O AYUB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.171, BANARAGIRI NAGAR, J.C.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 006. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.Z.A.KHURESHI & SRI. NOOR AHMED., ADVOCATES) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20720 RFA No. 519 of 2017 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.06.2025. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 17.06.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel for the appellant. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6