[2025:RJ-JP:26682] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10418/2025 1. Omprakash S/o Tulsi Urf Tursi, Aged About 55 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 2. Kailash S/o Tulsi Urf Tursi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 3. Gyanchand S/o Tulsi Urf Tursi, Aged About 50 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 4. Balram S/o Tulsi Urf Tursi, Aged About 33 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 5. Bhagwan Singh S/o Tulsi Urf Tursi, Aged About 53 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District- Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 6. Lakhan S/o Tulsi Urf Tursi, Aged About 28 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 7. Smt. Santo W/o Late Ghanshyam, Aged About 60 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District- Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 8. Sonu S/o Late Ghanshyam, Aged About 25 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 9. Haridas S/o Ghanshyam, Aged About 23 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) 10. Lakhan Singh S/o Bhulliram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Gayakund Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District-Deeg (Old District Bharatpur) (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Government Secretariat, [2025:RJ-JP:26682] (2 of 3) [CW-10418/2025] Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 5. District Collector, Deeg. 6. Sub Divisional Officer, Kaman, District Deeg. 7. Tehsildar, Kaman District Deeg. 8. Superintendent Of Police, Deeg, Rajasthan. 9. Station House Officer, Police Station Kaman District Deeg. 10. Superintending Engineer Public Works Department, Circle Deeg. 11. Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Kaman, District Deeg. 12. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Kaman, District Deeg. 13. Director, Local Self Government Department, Swayatt Shashan Bhawan, Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur. 14. Nagar Palika Kaman, Thruogh Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Kaman District Deeg (Raj.) 15. M/s R.k. And Sons, Aa Class, Pwd Contractor 353, Janta Colony, Belaka, Alwar, Rajasthan Through Manager M/s R.k. And Sons, Aa Class, Pwd Contractor 353, Janta Colony, Belaka, Alwar, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Yogesh Jatav for Mr.D. D. Khandelwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject agriculture land is in khatedari of the petitioners and without acquiring the subject land, the respondents are raising [2025:RJ-JP:26682] (3 of 3) [CW-10418/2025] constructions of road, drain and footpath, etc. without paying any compensation to the petitioners, hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted. 2. Before approaching this Court, the petitioners have not submitted any representation or notice for demand of justice to the respondents and straightaway, the instant writ petition has been filed seeking writ of mandamus against the respondents. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioners are expected to approach the Authorities concerned for redressal of their grievances. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to file representation before the Authorities concerned. In case, such representation is submitted by the petitioners within a period of two weeks from today, it is expected from the Authorities concerned to decide the same expeditiously as early as possible. 5. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/ order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 6. The instant writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /4