Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3232 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 NEERAJ KUMARI .....Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS ........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent-Bank. Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) This Court had passed the following order on 07.05.2024:
“Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that substantial amount due has been deposited by petitioner and only a sum of Rs.1,98,000/- is due as interest charges etc. Today, there is again no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 28.08.2024. In case petitioner is not represented and
arguments are not addressed on the next date of hearing, writ petition may be dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
Learned counsel for petitioner be notified of the date fixed.” Today again, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.07.08 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CWP No.3232 of 2023 (O&M) --2-- petition. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 08.07.2025 sandeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.07.08 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.