Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2391 (JHR)

MIRAZ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./237/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:19721 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 237 of 2025 ------ Miraz Ansari, aged about 23 years, S/o –Late Sarfuddin Mian, R/o Village –Sindarjuri, P.O.+P.S. –Karmatar, District – Jamtara. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 17.07.2025 I.A. No. 7542 of 2025 Heard the parties. This interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of this bail application. Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No. 237 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111(2)(ii), 317(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D of I.T. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cybercrime. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that there is no money trail and only because three mobile phones along with sim cards have been recovered from the petitioner, hence, he has been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.11.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/