1 2025:CGHC:17384 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 11 of 2014 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur, Distt Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. Executive Engineer Quality Control Unit, Water Resources Department, Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus  Ramswaroop Kushwaha S/o Shri Raghunathdeen Kushwaha, R/o Heenota Nandan, Maihar, Ps Maihar, Distt Satna, Madhya Pradesh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners/State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Lav Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16. 04.2025 1. The petitioners/State have challenged the award passed by the learned Labour Court, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) in Case No. 32/I.D.Act/2012/Reference dated 30.10.2013 whereby the order of termination of services was set aside and respondent was reinstated in service without payment of back wages. 2. Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the State/petitioners would fairly submit that services of respondent have been regularized vide order dated 28.02.2020. He would contend that the award passed by the learned Labour Court has already been complied with. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.04.17 18:00:59 +0530 2 3. On the other hand, Mr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent would submit that as the services of respondent have already been regularized, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the records. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that pursuant to the award passed by the learned Labour Court dated 30.10.2013, services of the respondent have been regularized vide order dated 28.02.2020; therefore, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the findings recorded by the learned Labour Court. Consequently, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant