Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040018522025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/527/2025 Sangey Tering Thongon and 8 Ors Son of Lam Norbu Thongon, resident of Village Rupa, PO and PS Rupa, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Miss Angel Waii Age: Occupation : Daughter of Sagam Waii residence of Village Wessang PO and SP Seppa East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Dindup Naksang Age: Occupation : Son of Phurba Naksang residence of Village Taching Panga PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Haae Matin Age: Occupation : Son of HAge Tam residence of Village Hari PO and PS Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Tatang Punyo Age: Occupation : Son of Punyo Olyung Page No.# 2/3 residence of Village Hong PO and PS Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: August Tamut Age: Occupation : Son of Tagam Tamut residence of Village Boying PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 7: Oding Tagi Age: Occupation : Son of Ogom Tagi residence of Village Sibum PO and PS Yingkiong Upper Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 8: Dujom Lego Age: Occupation : Son of Kabang Lego residence of Village Yapgo PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 9: Narang Tayu Age: Occupation : Son of Narang Takhe residence of Village Hari PO and PS Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The Secretary APPSC and 2 Ors Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 3/3 Department of Administrative Reforms Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Principal Secretary (Finance) Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Advocate for the Petitioner : Hage Lampu, Dani Dolley,Joram Sanjay,Khyoda Moses Advocate for the Respondent : Nani Anju, GA (AP),S/C APPSC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 13.11.2025 Heard Mr. H. Lampu, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. R.H.Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General for respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Ms. N. Anju, learned standing counsel for respondent no. 1 The learned counsel for the petitioners prays leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition and to approach the Court again to include challenge to the notification dated 21.04.2025. Prayer is allowed. The matter is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant