Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23902 (ALL)

TAHJEEB ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/7097/2025 · 2025-03-18

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39275 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7097 of 2025 Applicant :- Tahjeeb Ansari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Yadav,Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Tahjeeb Ansari with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.106 of 2023, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 485 I.P.C., P.S. Khorabar, District Gorakhpur during pendency of the trial. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Allegation alleged in the FIR is false and baseless and not supported by any evidence. Applicant has not provided any visa or ticket. He next submitted that on similarly situated facts, five FIRs have been registered against the applicant and same have been explained in paragraph 14 of the affidavit of bail application. Learned counsel for the applicant next submits that co-accused Jamil Khan & Dinesh Paswan have been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court by orders dated 17.04.2023 & 27.04.2023. Applicant's case is similar with co-accused. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 24.07.2024 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant, Tahjeeb Ansari, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad