1 2025:CGHC:4670 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2044 of 2019 • Smt. Awadh Kashyap W/o Kuldeep Kashyap Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Rigni, Tahsil Nawagarh, Police Station Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Secretary Department of Social Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Collector, Janjgir Champa, Distrct Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5. Superintendent of Police, Janjgir- Champa, Disrict Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 6. Station House Officer Police Station Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 7. Kannoujiya Kurmi Samaj, Through President, Dashrath Kashyap S/o Banthuliya, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Karra, Police Station Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kesharwani and Mr. Akash Singh, Advocates For Respondents No. 1 to 6 For Respondent No. 7 : : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General Mr. H.V. Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 27/01/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the State Official to take appropriate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 preventive, punitive action for mal-practice committed by the member of respondent no. 7. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to initiate adequate steps to insure the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Sakti Vahini Vs. Union of India & others. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti