Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23896 (GAU)

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. MANIKA SAIKIA AND 6 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2634/2024 · 2025-12-07

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010121852024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2634/2024 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 24 WHITES ROD, CHENNAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT GS ROAD GUWAHATI 781005 VERSUS MANIKA SAIKIA AND 6 ORS W/O LATE MADHAB SAIKIA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE USHAPUR MAJBAM GAON, PO USHAPUR, PS JOYPUR, DIST DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 786614 2:MISS NAYONTARA SAIKIA D/O LATE MADHAB SAIKIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE USHAPUR MAJBAM GAON PO USHAPUR PS JOYPUR DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786614 3:SRI AYUSH SAIKIA S/O LATE MADHAB SAIKIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE USHAPUR MAJBAM GAON PO USHAPUR PS JOYPUR DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786614 4:SMTI RINA SAIKIA W/O SRI SUREN SAIKIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE USHAPUR MAJBAM GAON Page No.# 2/3 PO USHAPUR PS JOYPUR DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786614 5:SRI SUREN SAIKIA S/O LATE TIPA SAIKIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE USHAPUR MAJBAM GAON PO USHAPUR PS JOYPUR DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786614 6:M/S A AND B ENTERPRISE PROPRIETOR SRI ARJUN SINGH SONAPUR NAMGHAR ROAD DAILY BAZAR PO AND PS DULIAJAN DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786602 7:SRI KULADHAR GOGOI S/O LUKESWAR GOGOI RESIDENT OF KACHALU GAON PO AND PS TINGKHONG 78661 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA, MRS L SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MS. S E AHMED (R- 1 TO 5), MR. D GOGOI (R-6,7),M AHMED(R- 1 TO 5),MR G BOKALIAL(R- 1 TO 5) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 08.12.2025 Heard Ms. L. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. G. Bokolial, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 5 as well as Mr. D. Gogoi, learned counsel representing the respondent nos. 6 and 7. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condoning the delay of 65 (sixty five) days in preferring the connected appeal. Mr. Bokolial and Mr. Gogoi have submitted that they have no objection if the delay is condoned. I find that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. Name of Mr. G. Bokolial and Mr. D. Gogoi, learned counsels shall be shown in the Cause List as the counsel representing the respondents. JUDGE Comparing Assistant