Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23894 (GAU)

GANESH MAHTO v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/1200/2025 · 2025-11-11

Michael Zothankhuma, Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010240752025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1200/2025 GANESH MAHTO SO LT NATHANI MAHATO, PERMANENT R/O. IBRAHIMPUR, BEGUSARAI, LAKHANPATTI , PS LAKNA , DIST BEGUSARI ,BIHAR PRESENTLY RESIDING AT AMULAPATTY, WARD NO. 09, SIVASAGAR TOWN, P/O AND P/S.SIVASAGAR, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM. 2:MITLESH CHOUDHURY S/O. LT. RAJENDRA CHOUDHURY R/O. AMGURI GHAT P/S. AND P/O. SIVASAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM PIN-78568 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS S BARPUJARI, MR P KATAKI,MRS R BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Page No.# 2/2 Date : 12-11-2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mrs. R. Begum, the learned counsel for the applicant who submits that there is a delay of 8 days in filing the appeal against the conviction u/s 6 of the POCSO Act. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has no objection if the delay is condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 8 days is condoned. Registry to list the appeal. IA is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant