CHANDRAKANT KUMAR THAKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4974/2025 · 2025-09-01
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23889 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23889 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:26377
--1-- A.B.A. No. 4974 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4974 of 2025
---- Chandrakant Kumar Thakur, aged about 25 years, son of Late Ram Chandra Thakur, resident of village – Arbehya, PO – Damdar, PS – Chandwa, District - Latehar .... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Advocate
---- 02/01.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.39 of 2023 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 379 and 411 of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned ACJM, Latehar.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the said vehicle was in process of transfer in the name of the petitioner and the vehicle has been possessed by the petitioner on the basis of the agreement. He submits that the allegations are made that scrap iron ore has been loaded on the said vehicle of Abhijit Power Plant. He submits that however Abhijit Power Plant has not lodged the FIR.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner happened to be the owner of the
2025:JHHC:26377
--2-- A.B.A. No. 4974 of 2025
said vehicle and in the said vehicle illegally scrap iron ore has been loaded.
5. In view of the above facts and looking into the contents of the impugned order, it transpires that the petitioner has received the notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C. and has also complied the same in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/