Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23882 (JHR)

MANOJ KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/792/2024 · 2025-01-08

S N Pathak

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 792 of 2024 ---------- 1.Manoj Kumar 2.Santosh Kumar 3.Manoj Kumar 4.Rohit Kumar Singh 5.Tarique Anwar 6.Mahabir Munda 7.Abhishek Kumar 8.Raju Saw 9.Vishwanath Munda 10.Mohan Kachhap 11.Sunita Toppo 12.Rinku Devi 13.Mangru Oraon 14.Amit Kumar Mahto 15.Asha Oraon 16.Punam Kachhap 17.Mumtaz Zehra Zaidi (Zehra Rizvi) 18.Ankita Priya 19.Shanti Devi 20.Mukhlal Mahto 21.Pramvir Kachhap 22.Nirmal Prabhakar Sharifa 23.Suraj Kumar Pandey 24.Vikas Lakra 25.Krishna Ram 26.Aslam Perwez 27.Sunil Tigga 28.Gandru Gosain 29.Madhusudan Ram 30.Manoj Kumar 31.Sarojani Hansda 32.Sunil Munda 33.Anuradha Kachhap 34.Sharwan Chandra Hemrom 35.Vijay Mandal 36.Laxmi Devi 37.Usha Kachhap 38.Anil Oraon ………… Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Dr. Namita Singh, wife of not known to the petitioners, presently posted as Registrar, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukharjee University, Ranchi, Dist.-Ranchi ………… Opp. Parties ------- 2 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Gaurav Abhishek, AC to AG Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate ---------- 04/ 08.01.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the order of this Court has already been complied with. 2. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) Rohit/-