Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23881 (KAR)

SRI R KISHORE v. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE

WP/10390/2020 · 2025-02-06

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5442 WP No. 10390 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 10390 OF 2020 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI R KISHORE S/O. RAJKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT NO. 146, 9TH MAIN, 60 FEET ROAD, J.C. NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM LAYOUT, KURUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKASH V T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, HAVING ITS OFFICE ITS NARASIMHA RAJA SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. 2. ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER CHANDRA LAYOUT SUB-DIVISION, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE COMPLEX, 14TH CROSS, CHANDRA LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE-560 039. 3. BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, 2ND FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R3) Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5442 WP No. 10390 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS FROM OBSTRUCTING / INTERFERING WITH FREE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF THE PETITIONER TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY, RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM ENCROACHING / DEMOLISHING EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE OF THE PETITIONER SITUATED IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition was filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to restrain them from interfering with the free ingress and egress of the petitioner to his property. 2. Further, he submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, BBMP has demolished the structure situated in the property of the petitioner and has erected a water tank over the said land. 3. Hence, he filed a memo for withdrawal seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5442 WP No. 10390 of 2020 to approach the Civil Court for issuance of appropriate action against BBMP. 4. Submission and memo are placed on record. 5. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner as sought for. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE sks