1 2025:CGHC:2162 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 196 of 2025 1 - Kartik Ram Patel S/o Late Sevak Ram Patel Aged About 85 Years Retired Hawaldar -- R/o Village Nariyara, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir- Chmpa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Collector, Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional (Revenue), Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tahsildar, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Laxmin Tondey, Advocate along with Shri Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.01.14 23:39:42 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 14.01.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the order dated 25.01.2023, by which the Tehsildar has rejected his application by which the petition was seeking entry of his name in the land bearing Khasra No. 1212/1, village Nariyara, tahsil Akaltara District Janjgir-Champa. The Tehsildar has rejected the said application by the order observing that the petitioner failed to produce any document in support of the land in question, whether the land in question has been allotted to him or not, and on what basis the petitioner is seeking entry of his name in Revenue record. 2. Learned State Counsel submit that the order of Tehsildar is very clear as the petitioner has failed to produce any document for correction or entry of his name in the revenue record against the land in question, hence the order of the Tehsildar is just and proper. 3. I have heard both the counsels for the parties and perused the order of Tehsildar. 4. Learned Tehsildar has rightly rejected the application of the petitioner, as the petitioner has failed to produce any document showing that the land in question allotted to him, on the basis of which he is seeking entry of his name in the Revenue Record. Hence, there is no illegality in the order passed by Tehsildar. The writ petiton is dismissed, however the petitioner is at liberty to approach appropriate authority by producing sufÏcient document in 3 accordance with law for entry of his name in the Revenue Record against the land in question. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off, with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib