1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMP No.21835 of 2025 Decided on: 18 th September , 2025 __________________________________________________ Jishan Lal …….applicant Versus State of H.P. and others …....respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the applicant: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, for Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral) Counsel for the applicant does not press the application for revival of the execution, in view of the fact that vide order dated 09.09.2025, the work charge benefit has been given w.e.f. 01.01.2003 and the pay has been fixed in the Pay Scale of Rs.3120-5160, by giving the work charge status notionally, in view of the judgment in Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025 arising out of SLP (C) No.23016 of 2023 titled as State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. vs. Surajmani & anr. along with connected matters, decided on 06.02.2025. 2. Keeping in view the above, the application stands 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 disposed of as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( G.S. Sandhawalia ) Chief Justice 18 th September , 2025 ( Ranjan Sharma ) (ankit) Judge