Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23871 (JHR)

MAHTO PURTY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8440/2024 · 2025-01-10

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8440 of 2024 Mahto Purty aged about 38 years, son of Jurendra Purty @ Narendra Purty, resident of Village Chhota Kuira P.O & P.S. Goilkera, District West Singhbhum Jharkhand … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party WITH B.A. No. 8452 of 2024 Budhan Singh Purty aged about 36 years son of Sadhu Purty @ Sadhu Charan Purty, resident of Village Chhota Kuira P.0.& P.S. Goilkera, District West Singhbhum Jharkhand … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioners : M/s. Rajesh Ranjan Srivastav, Advocate For the State : M/s. Saket Kumar, A.P.P : M/s. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P --- 03/10.01.2025 Heard the Parties. Both these bail applications arise out of same police case. Accordingly, they are being disposed of by a common order. Petitioners have been made an accused in connection with Goilkera P.S. case No.19/2024 registered under section 376-D, 342, 313, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Learned S.D.J.M. Porahat West Singhbhum at Chaibasa. The petitioners who are friends are alleged to have gang raped the victim. Statement of the victim has been recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that her marriage was fixed with the petitioner Budhan Singh Purty. Regard being had to the facts and circumstance of the case and considering the nature of allegation; I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is hereby rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Saurabh uploaded