Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23867 (KAR)

SRI SHIVABEERAIAH S M v. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF

WP/15380/2015 · 2025-01-13

S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1228 WP No. 15380 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 15380 OF 2015 (S-DIS) BETWEEN: SRI SHIVABEERAIAH S M AGED 32 YEARS, S/O SRI.MADAIAH, FORMER CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, KUNDAPURA, R/O NO.104, 1ST MAIN ROAD, GANGAPPA GARDEN, KP AGRAHARA, BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S M SHIVABEERAIAH, PARTY-IN-PERSON (ABSENT)). AND: 1. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW & PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1228 WP No. 15380 of 2015 BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRI.ARIHANT KUMAR.R.SUNGAY, ADVOCATE FOR SMT.SUMANA NAGANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI.NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKHAR, AGA FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS RELATING TO, CONCERNING AND CONNECTED WITH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DT.7.2.2015, VIDE ANNX-G ISSUED BY THE R-2, PERUSE THE SAME AND DECLARE THE SAID NOTIFICATION AS VIOLATIVE INTERALIA, OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE, RULE 7 OF THE KCS (PROBATION ) RULES, 1977 AND ALSO AS VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES 14, 16(1), 21 & 311 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT ORAL ORDER Since the party-in-person is appearing in this petition, this Court by order dated 25.11.2024 directed the Registry to intimate the date of hearing to the party-in- person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1228 WP No. 15380 of 2015 2. The intimation sent to the petitioner returned with postal shara “No such person in the address”. The intimation is sent to the address shown in the cause title. 3. It appears that the petitioner/party-in-person is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE MPK CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2