1 2025:CGHC:26560-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1920 of 2025 1. Abhishek Verma S/o Dhannalal Verma Aged About 44 Years Resident Of Polsai Para, Mahalaxmi Printing Press Gali, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.) 2. Nitin Verma S/o Dhannalal Verma Aged About 43 Years Resident of Polsai Para, Mahalaxmi Printing Press Gali, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 3. Vinay Verma S/o Dhannalal Verma Aged About 39 Years Resident of Polsai Para, Mahalaxmi Printing Press Gali, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Pulgaon, District and Tehsil Durg (C.G.) 2. The Superintendent of Police Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Shri Purushottam Verma S/o Late D.P. Verma Aged About 66 Years R/o Vidyut Nagar, Police Station Padmanabpur, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 4. Pratik Verma S/o Purushottam Verma Aged About 32 Years R/o Vidyut Nagar, Police Station Padmanabpur, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 5. Yash Verma S/o Purushottam Verma Aged About 30 Years R/o Vidyut Nagar, Police Station Padmanabpur, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.06.24 10:41:37 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 23.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. Aman Tamrakar, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondents No. 1 & 2/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this CRMP and quash FIR No. 66 of 2025 dated 06.03.2025 registered under Section 296, 3(5), 324(4) and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 registered in Police Station Pulgaon (Annexure P/1) in the interest of justice. ” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the present petition has been filed for quashing of the FIR, but in the present case, the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court against the petitioners, therefore, he prays that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to challenge the same. 4. Prayer is allowed. 3 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum, if so advised. 6. Certified copy of the FIR and other documents may be returned back to the petitioners after retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan