APHC010337832018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15532/2018 Between: APSRTC SC/ST VUDYOGULA SAMKSHEMA SANGAM, REGD. AND RECOG. NO.177/2015 (AFFILIATED BY 2409/1990 RECOGNIZED BY THE GOVT. OF INDIA) OFFICT AT 11-2, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT MR. M. ABRAHAM, S/O.GEORGE, AGED 53 YEARS OFF TRAFFIC INSPECTOR-III, E.NO.352786 APSRTC, IBRAHIMPATNAM DEPOT, KRISHNA DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR APSRTC, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION RTC HOUSE VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION APSRTC, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION RTC HOUSE VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. EZRA SASTRY KOVVURU, S/O. K.V. RAGHAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE R/O. HARIJINAWADA, CHELLAYA PALEM NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. A THOMAS, E.NO.353102 ADC, ELURU DEPOT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR TRANSPORT (AP) 2. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No.3 in issuing Office Order by providing duty relief to the respondent No.4 and 5 vide Order No.R5/660(1)/2018-RandT dated 14.03.2018 is illegal, arbitrary consequently set aside the same.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, in the light of the interim order dated 30.04.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 and as the Respondents have complied with the said order, no further orders are required in this matter as the relief has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15532 of 2018 Dt.07.03.2025 Dinesh