IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 1087 of 2024 Date of Decision: 12.03.2025 Mukesh Sharma ... petitioner Versus State of H.P and anr. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Pranshul Sharma, Advocate. For respondent No.1 : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General. For respondent No.2 : Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 12th March, 2025 (saurav pathania) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.