PAWAN KUMAR S/O MANGALCHAND v. RADHA DEVI W/O ROHITASH
CSA/188/2022 · 2025-04-30
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23847 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23847 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18249] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 188/2022
1. Pawan Kumar S/o Mangalchand, Aged About 55 Years, Through Power Of Attorney Mamta Devi W/o Pawan Kumar. Resident Of Behind Punia Wines, Jaipur Road, Industrial Area Sikar, Tehsil And District-Sikar (Raj.).
2. Mamta Devi W/o Pawan Kumar, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Behind Punia Wines, Jaipur Road, Industrial Area Sikar, Tehsil And District-Sikar (Raj.).
3. Vikas S/o Pawan Kumar, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Behind Punia Wines, Jaipur Road, Industrial Area Sikar, Tehsil And District-Sikar (Raj.). ----Appellants Versus
1. Radha Devi W/o Rohitash, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Raghunathgarh, Presently Residing At Destination Post Badi Johdi, Near Bus Stand, Prem Nagar, Tan Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Rohitash S/o Harishchandra, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Raghunathgarh, Presently Residing At Destination Post Badi Johdi, Near Bus Stand, Prem Nagar, Tan Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bipin Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : None Present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 30/04/2025 Matter comes up on application 1/2025 filed by the appellants for withdrawal of the civil second appeal on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
[2025:RJ-JP:18249] (2 of 2) [CSA-188/2022] For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. The present civil second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, stand, disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH GULERIA /127