Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040010442025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/105/2025 Lourdu Samy Sahaya Nirmal and Anr Son of Shri Lourdu Samy, resident of Flat No.44B, 1st Floor Pink Apartment, Dwarka Sector-1A, New Delhi 110001, 2: S Vinothkumar Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Shanmugavel resident of 33/2 B-1 PRDL Paradise Mullai Nagar Surmangalam Salem Tamil Nadu 636005 Managing Director M/s Rank Projects and Development Private Ltd having its registered office at 33/2 B-1 PRDPL Paradise Mullai Nagar Suramangalam Salem Tamil Nadu 63600 VERSUS The State of AP and Anr represented by the PP of AP 2:Ms Likha Someen Age: 22 Occupation : proprietor of M/s Shomeen Infra Tech Borum Bridge Naharlagun Arunachal Pradesh 79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak, Tonni Gammi,Tukrin Ligu,Tanur Gao,Amy Talom,Goyi Taba Raju Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Charu Bosco,Morrik Bagra,Phunai Wangpan,Tojam Mossang,Yanum Singhi,Jyoti Zongluju Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : Crl.Petn./136/2025 Lourdu Samy Sahaya Nirmal and Anr Age: 50 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Lourdu Samy resident of Flat No.44B 1st Floor Pink Apartment Dwarka Sector-1A New Delhi 110001 VERSUS The State of AP and Anr Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the PP of AP 2:Ms Likha Someen Age: 22 Occupation : proprietor of M/s Shomeen Infra Tech Borum Bridge Naharlagun Arunachal Pradesh 79111 ------------ Advocate for : Goyi Taba Raju Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for The State of AP and Anr: Advocate , , appearing for 2, 3, respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 20.11.2025 Heard Mr. Adam Tatak, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Duksor Loyi, learned Public Prosecutor, Arunachal Pradesh, and Mr. N. Yedei, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Ms. Jyoti Zongluju, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2. By an order, dated 26.06.2025, passed in the connected criminal petition, this Court while issuing notice upon the respondents, has directed that further Page No.# 3/3 proceeding of the First Information Report(FIR), dated 19.03.2025, shall remain stayed till the next returnable date. However, the same was not continued thereafter. By filing of this application, the applicants have prayed for continuation of the interim order. The learned counsels appearing for the Opposite Parties/ respondents have no objection. In view of the above, the prayer is accepted. Accordingly, the interim order, dated 26.06.2025, passed in the connected petition being Crl.P. 136/2025, shall continue till the next date of listing. With the above directions, the instant interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant