APHC010336792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI •Iff FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: fi048 OF 207? PRATAPA Between: Kota Vijaya Lakshmi, D/o. Agriculture R/o. D.No. 32/431-8-27 city, YSR District. (A-2) Varada Reddy Aged about 49 years, Occ. Caste. Kapu, Om Santhi Nagar, Kapada ■..Petitioner/Accused No.2 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Through Represented by its Public j, Amaravati, Guntur, Dist. Obul Reddy, Occ. Tahsildar, Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 2. D Udaya Bhaskar Raju, S/o. Chinna ' Pendlimarri Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C stated in the Memorandum of Grounds may be pleased to quash the i the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of praying that in the circumstances of Criminal Petition, the High Court proceedings C.C.No.1473 of 2021 on the file of Class, Kadapa. lA NO: 1 OF 207.^ Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C stated in the Memorandum of Grounds praying that in the circumstances of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. 1473 of 2021 on the file of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of Class, Kadapa including appearance of the petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PENJURI VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1: ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER: % / APHC010336792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] Sly FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5048/2023 Between: 1.KOTA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, D/0. VARADA REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/0. D.NO. 32/431-8-27, CASTE. KAPU, OM SANTHl NAGAR, KAPADA CITY, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR, DIST. 2.D UDAYA BHASKAR RAJU, S/0. CHINNA OBUL REDDY, OCC. TAHSILDAR, PENDLIMARRI MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the proceedings C.C.No. 1473 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble II Additional Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Kadapa and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. 1473 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble II Additional 2 Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Kadapa including petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.PENJURI VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) appearance of the pass 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner/accused, seeking quashment of proceedings against her in C.C.No.1473 of 2021, on the file of learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of class, Kadapa. 2. Heard Sri Penjuri Venugopal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of dispensing the presence of the Petitioner before the trial Court on every adjournment. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court, unless her presence is specifically directed by the trial Court. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the contentions before the trial Court in his defence. The learned trial Judge may appreciate the same and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stands closed. 3. 4. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Judicial Magistrate of Class, Kadapa. n 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh One CC to Sri. Penjuri Venugopal, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies [OUT] 3. 4. SRL sree HIGH COURT DATED:22/08/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 5048 OF 2023 o 2 3 SEP *^CiitmtSecti o DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION