SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2025:UHC:1467-DB COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 03.03.2025 HABC No. 04 OF 2025 Hon'ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Heard Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand, and Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 2. The corpus- Ms. Nikita Negi is produced before the Court. She admits the marriage with the petitioner, and states that it was not valid. 3. Be that as it may, the corpus further submits that now she is residing with her parents voluntarily, and there is no coercion or threat, and she does not desire to accompany the petitioner. 4. The corpus being a major, and the corpus having taken a decision to live with her parents, the instant petition does not survive for consideration. 5. The corpus having separated voluntarily, and residing with her parents without any coercion or duress, the instant Habeas Corpus Petition does not survive for consideration and is, therefore, rejected. The rejection of the instant petition will not come in the way of the parties to seek for any remedy as permissible under the law. 6. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J) (G. Narendar, CJ) 03.03.2025 03.03.2025 Rathour