Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6192 WP No. 28531 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 28531 OF 2014 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
SRI. D.S. RAMAMURTHY SON OF LATE D.V. SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A. LIG-1/16, E & F BLOCK, 3RD 'G' CROSS, RAMAKRISHNANAGARA, MYSORE - 570 023.
NOTE: SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAIK V.S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC, MYSORE CITY TRANSPORT DIVISION, MYSORE - 570 001
2.
THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER DIVISION-II, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, KARMIKA BHAVANA BANGALORE - 560 029.
3.
THE ASST. LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, MYSORE - 570 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. H.R. RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SMT. RASHMI RAO, HCGP FOR R2 & R3.)
Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6192 WP No. 28531 of 2014
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE R-2 PERTAINING TO ANNX-D AND GRANT THE PETITIONER THE FOLLOWING RELIEFS. QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 DTD 23.1.2013, THE TRUE COPY OF WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNX-D AND ETC.,
THIS W.P., COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and the learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.2 and
3.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 would submit that the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.100515/2015 has taken a view contrary to the
contentions raised by the petitioner before this Court.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that SLP Civil No.4744/2020 is dismissed confirming the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6192 WP No. 28531 of 2014
order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. He further submits that the petition is not maintainable.
4. Considering the submission, this Court is of the view that the petition is to be dismissed. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25