Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23835 (AP)

DASARI JYOTSNA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/18514/2025 · 2025-07-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010336252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18514/2025 Between: 1. DASARI JYOTSNA, D/O VENKATANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O RAKETLA VILLAGE, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DIST. 2. NALLABOTHULA PUJITHA,, W/O NALLABOTHULA NARESH, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O VEEREPALLI VILLAGE, PEDDAVADAGURU MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY MANDAL SURVEYOR, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be SRS,J W.P.No.18514 of 2025 pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4 respondent in not conducting the survey of the petitioners land an extent of Ac. 1.06 cents in Sy. No. 388-1 of 1st petitioner and an extent of Ac. 1.07 cents in Sy. No. 388-1 of 2nd petitioner situated in Raketla Village, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to conduct the survey of the petitioners land and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to conduct the survey and fixed the boundary stones of the petitioners land an extent of Ac. 1.06 cents in Sy. No. 388-1 of 1st petitioner and an extent of Ac. 1.07 cents in Sy. No. 388-1 of 2nd petitioner situated in Raketla Village, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur District, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.4 is not considering the F-Line application (Ex.P1) filed by them to survey the land in respect of Ac.1.06 cents in Sy.No.388-1 of the 1st petitioner and Ac.1.07 cents in Sy.No.388-1 of the 2nd petitioner of Raketla Village, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur District. Page 3 of 4 SRS,J W.P.No.18514 of 2025 2. Heard Sri M. Karibasaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri G.Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appeared for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 1st petitioner owned Ac.1.06 cents in Sy.No.388-1 and 2nd petitioner owns an extent of Ac.1.07 cents in Sy.No.388-1, Raketla Village, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur District. The petitioners made an F-line application vide FSNV012400445186 (Ex.P1). However, the same was not considered. 4. Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.4 will pass appropriate orders on the F-line application made by the petitioners vide Ex.P1, as per law. The same is recorded. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing the respondent No.4 to pass appropriate orders (to survey and demarcate the boundaries as the A.P.Survey and Boundaries Act) on the F-line application made by the petitioners vide Ex.P1, strictly as per the law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 22.07.2025 TVN SRS,J W.P.No.18514 of 2025 193 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.18514 OF 2025 Date : 22.07.2025 TVN