/■' APHC010336272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMB FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N / WRIT PETITION NO: 17202 OF 2025 Between: Jasti Narasimha Rao, S/o.Koteswar Rao Aged about 40 years, OccDiary Farm Business, R/o.Vitalapuram Village, Thallur Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Station House Officer, Thallur Police Station, Thallur, Prakasam District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District. . 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, . Guntur, Guntur Dustrict 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, . Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 5. Singamsetti Mallikarjuna Rao, Sub-Inspector of Police, Thallur Police, Prakasam District. 6. Ganta Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Gopi, Aged about 38 years, Occ Business, R/o.Ganta Uru Village, Palamaneru Mandal, Chittoor Distri ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be > . pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 1 in interfering with the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 relating to the recovery of amount and summing the Petitioner to the Police Station, wrongfully confining him, abusing him with filthy language, beating him with rubber belt, threatening to implicate in false criminal case and committing extortion as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India, beyond jurisdiction and consequently direct the Respondent No.I not to disturb the peace and personal liberty of the Petitioner by interfering in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 without following due process of law in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 not to disturb the peace and personal liberty of the Petitioner by interfering in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 7: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010336272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17202/2025 Between: 1.JASTI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O.KOTESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCDIARY FARM BUSINESS, R/O.VITALAPURAM VILLAGE, THALLUR MANUAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THALLUR POLICE STATION, THALLUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. . 3.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, . GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, . REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5.SINGAMSETTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THALLUR POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6.GANTA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.GOPI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.GANTA URU VILLAGE, PALAMANERU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRI 2 ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the f^espondent No. 1 in interfering with the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 relating to the recovery of amount and summing the Petitioner to the Police Station, wrongfully confining him, abusing him with filthy language, beating him with rubber belt, threatening to implicate in false criminal case and committing extortion as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India, beyond jurisdiction and consequently direct the Respondent No.I not to disturb the peace and personal liberty of the Petitioner by interfering in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 without following due process of law in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.I not to disturb the peace and personal liberty of the Petitioner by interfering in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PNAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): I 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17202 of 2025 ORDER:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Nos.1 and 5, at the behest of respondent No.6, are interfering in civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6. It is submitted that the respondent Nos.1 and 5 have pressurized the petitioner to execute undertaking to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- to the 6*^ respondent. It is submitted that one police constable in the police station scribed the 3aid undertaking. an 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the police have called the petitioner to the police station for enquiry purpose complaint received from the 6*^ respondent and the police have also ascertained that it is a financial transaction. on a 4. Considering the submissions, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at the admission stage by directing respondent Nos.1 and 5 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.6 without following the due process of law. - .0, 4 5. With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- KJ.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S officer To, 1. The Station House Officer, Thallur Police Station, Prakasam District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, . Guntur, Guntur District 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, . Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 5. OneCCto SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. Thallur, AL X, HIGH COURT DATED:11/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 17202 OF 2025 ^ 13 AUG 2025 !X> isi^uiTent Sectioiv^'!^ «2\ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS