2025:JHHC:12978 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 748 of 2024 --- Meera Sinha wife of Late Arun Kumar, resident of Jai Prakash Nagar, Gaya (Bihar) … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Sunil Dutt Xaxa, the General Manager, (P&GA), Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Dhurwa, Ranchi …. … Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Aditya Kumar, A.C. to Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, SC (JUVNL) Order No. 13 Dated: 30.04.2025 The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no. 2 alleging willful violation of order dated 16.08.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3649 of 2023. 2. Mr. Adtiya Kumar, A.C. to Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, learned Standing Counsel (JUVNL) appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, refers to paragraph-6 of the show cause affidavit filed on behalf of the said opposite party, which reads as under: “6. That it is most humbly and respectfully submitted that in compliance of order dated 16.08.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3649 of 2023 by this Hon’ble Court, the answering respondent has passed as reasoned order issued vide letter no. 1213 dated 21.09.2024, pursuant to which the petitioner has been found to be entitled for payment of the following benefits and the same has been credited to the account of the petitioner vide Cheque No. 323613 dated 20.09.2024. a. Leave Encashment b. Revised pay c. Revised pension d. Revised Gratuity Rs.8,877/- Rs.14,975/- Rs.1,25,242/- Rs.15,213/- Cheuqe no. 323613 dated 20.09.2024 Total Rs.1,64,307/- 2 “Copy of letter no. 1213 dated 21.09.2024 along with payment details have been annexed as Annexure-A series to the said show cause affidavit.” 3. It is thus submitted that the aforesaid order of this Court has been complied. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the show cause affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, there is no need to further proceed in the present matter. 5. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no.2 is hereby dropped. 6. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. 7. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law for redressal of her subsisting grievance. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Ritesh/